The followers of Muhammad (peace be upon him) between Iran and USA

This region is the core of every conflict between East and West. Whenever the conflict rages between them, we find it on our land: This Arab spot of our Muslim world.

This region never had an independent entity and deterrent force but after the emergence of Islam and the spread of its call all over the world which resulted in the opening of Persia and the Romans and people embraced it in crowds. Nevertheless, hatred remained buried in the chests of some people, so we see a Persian and Roman grudge that is looking forward to reach the region and want to seize it. What we see these days is just the embodiment of this grudge: The Iranian wolf howls on the Gulf to have a share in that spot which is being organized by the U.S. under the name of (the new Middle East).

Today, Iran declares itself as a regional actor to foster the Shiite minorities in the Muslim world in Afghanistan, Pakistan, Iraq, Egypt, Yemen and others. It wants to plant ticking-time bombs to explode in certain times.

As for USA, it fosters the Jewish minority [i.e., Israel], which exists within the Muslim World, and backs it financially, economically, and militarily as well as the Christians in the Muslim countries such as Egypt.

Then we find the expansionist policy of Iran and USA is similar and overlapping. Iran wants to draw the borders of the major Shiite state, calling into mind the glory of the Persian Kingdom that extended westward until Iraq and Lebanon and southward until Bahrain, Qatar, and Al Ihsa', so it has a expansionist ideology at the expense of its neighbors. As for USA which comes from far west to land its planes, missiles, equipments, soldiers, warships on our land to re-plan the region and give a room for the Zionist expansion from the Nile to the Euphrates, which is impossible!

This grim reality of the Muslim nation (the followers of Muhammad (peace be upon him)) between Iran and USA (the followers of Ibn Saba' and the followers of Paul) reminds us of our history and past which suffered from distortion, falsification, and sometimes killing.

Distortion and falsification occurred at the hands of these Orientalists and Shiite narrators because each has his religious and intellectual project.

We see Orientalists come to study our history and civilization while they have Christianization in their quiver. So, they work on spreading it in Muslim countries mercilessly and relentlessly, taking advantage of disasters, accidents, and wars, then we find them writing many books about Islamic history and civilization in a way that is consistent with their deviant whims. They are minimizing what is big, maximizing what is minor, and insulting the Prophet (peace be upon him) and his Companions by describing him with improper words.

As for Shiite narrators and historians, they are neither inferior nor meaner than Orientalists because they fabricated baseless narrations to attack the grand Companions. Shiites have their religious project that aims at spreading Shiism among Muslim communities taking advantage of disasters and accidents, and if people do not reach the religious Shiism, only political Shiism is enough.

It is enough to see that some of the Muslim World sympathizes with Iran (the sponsor of Shiites) as happened after the war of Hezbollah with Israel, and after the statements of Ahmadi Nejad against Israel.

Back to our reality to see the images of treason, killing, and destruction to our human energies as a natural result of the Shiite-Crusader correlation of which we shall mention few features:

1- The Fatimid occupied the city of Tyre in 1097 AD during the Crusaders' siege of Antioch and offered them coalition against the Seljuk Muslims and facilitated the entry of the Crusaders to Jerusalem which led to the killing of seventy thousand Muslims!

2- The betrayal of Ibn Al `Alqami, Ibn Abu Al Hadid, and Nasir Al-Din At-Tusi —-the axis of evil to the Muslim nation— and setting an alliance with the infidel Tatar to attack Baghdad and kill its people and seize their funds. When Hulagu was afraid of killing the Abbasid caliph because he was one of the offspring of Muhammad (peace be upon him), At-Tusi gave him an exotic Fatwa which says: Put the Caliph inside a sack and tie it, then kick him until death without shedding a drop of his blood. He permitted the infidels to do what they thought to be prohibited. Accordingly, Hulagu killed about 800.000 or 1.000.000 Muslims; it was the price of maintaining faith and the treason of cowards.

3- The Safavid State entered Baghdad, exterminated the Sunnis, and extended to the borders of the Ottoman Empire which led to the failure of the Ottoman siege to Vienna. The Ottoman armies went back to Turkey to fight the Safavid State and gained victory over them in the battle of Chaldiran 1514, but that damned State disrupted the Islamic tide toward the center of Europe.

The Safavid allied with the Portuguese to let them occupy Bahrain, Al Qatif, and Al Ihsa' and the Portuguese occupied Palestine! That was the first deal to sell Palestine.

In our contemporary reality: Did not Iran facilitate the entry of the American forces to Afghanistan to eliminate the Taliban and kill thousands of Mujahedeen? Was not Iran the country that let the Shiite enter Iraq after its fall into the hands of the Americans to change the identity of the Sunnis to Shiism, and participated in the killing and dragging of 8.00.000 Muslims and the number is still growing? Did not Shiite sell Iraq to its enemies and defile its land with the blood of its people?

What we are experiencing today is only a phase of the Shiite-Crusader alliance against Muslims, so we see murder and dragging here and there; indeed those are the greatest danger to Islam which aim to change the geography of our countries, falsify news in our history, kill and waste our human energies.

One last word:

Our nation will not overcome these two dangers but by returning to the Book of Allah and the Sunnah of His Messenger (peace be upon him), sticking to them, and having a profound faith, static and clear ideology to work accordingly to bypass the lapses of the past and the pitfalls of the present with future leaps.

Excerpted from the book of "The return of the Safavids" of Sheikh `Abdul-`Aziz ibn Salih Al Mahmoud.