Will colonialism accompany the Arab revolutions?

The importance of answering this question in the middle of the Libyan events which reached no way back, where the intervention of the western forces became close though it is ambiguous. Before answering this, let us mention one of our religion's postulates which is: Allah alone is the one who says: "be," and it is done. So, the West and USA do not destine things, and in many cases, world events run in contrary to the wishes of the Westerners, especially USA.

In record time and in an unexpected time, two Arab countries were set free and the third is few steps far from liberation. Although plots, conspiracies, and the counter-revolution that is supported by the West against the rebels, Egyptians and Tunisians succeeded in eradicating corruption from its roots and reached the wanted goals despite some problems.

This is natural in turning the countries from a state to another. The problem is the country in between which is "Libya" where the West found a chance to reach their goals through the madness of the Libyan tyrant who is annihilating his people. Here is the answer to the question: History shall not repeat itself.

The former colonialism is going far, day after another, because of several considerations: First, the total and the absolute military, informational, and economic dominance of the West have gone forever. If the West is still superior in some fields, it is no longer superior as before, not even close to it.

The West has begun to lose its dominance and influence. For example: What happens in the African continent concerning the fierce competition between China and India, Brazil and Turkey, Korea and Malaysia, and some countries which obtain the contracts of major projects for many countries in the continent.

Second, After the removal of the Libyan tyrant, it will be very difficult for the West, especially in Libya, to nominate another traitor where "Libya" combines isolation from the West which continued for decades and the popular consciousness. Moreover, the West failed to achieve that in "Egypt" in spite of its ample influence and multiple traitors. If the regime in Libya shall be elected by the people, these kind of governments cannot be tamed and the West realizes that.

Third, the military subjugation and dominance as happened in Iraq is something cannot be accepted neither regionally nor globally, moreover it cannot be accepted even by the western peoples.

Fourth, Unlike the age of colonialism; the age of obscuring and darkness, our today's media has exceeded the open space to break time and place; "Twitter" and "facebook" are two examples because media now has no limits.

Fifth, the neighboring countries to Libya including "Egypt" and "Tunisia" are heading firmly toward democratic governments that represent the people. These governments shall not subject to the tries of suffocating the Libyans for the best interest of the colonial interests as a form of the services that the former governments used to offer to the western governments in a low price, moreover, it is closer to alliance and integration more than collision. Of course, no one denies that the west in "Libya" would reap significant gains, especially in the economic side which is a necessary evil, but by the will of Allah. ,by the will of Allah, it will not hinder renaissance and construction of man before the building, the renaissance that was formed in its first phase in North Africa.