Is there a tangible effect to the declaration of the Palestinian State?

After US had declared its failure in pressing on the Zionist entity, to freeze colonization for two months until the resumption of the direct negotiations that USA was fostering between the Israeli and the Palestinians, in the last September the Palestinian President Abu Mazen declared his seven choices in which he mentioned that the Palestinian decision against the Israeli obstinacy will be determined according to the new conditions.

Of these options is the declaration of the independent Palestinian State on the borders of 1967 and demanding USA to acknowledge the new state. However, in case USA refused to admit it, resorting to the Security Council is a must and demanding Washington not to use the right of "Veto" against that.

Indeed, Brazil, Argentina, and Bolivia, Uruguay, and the Ecuador declared their acknowledgement of the Palestine State on the borders of 67. Some European countries have also threatened to admit the Palestinian State if Israel insisted on going on with their colonization plans.

Some observers see that the step of declaring the state by some countries is counted as an important accumulation in favor of the Palestinian cause that is added to previous accumulations such as: the recognition of more than 100 countries when the Palestinian State was established for the first time in Algeria in the eighties  (15 Nov 1988).

The declaration of the Palestinian State according to the available circumstances now —in my opinion— does not represent an important addition to the Palestinian reality, however it may reflect a default in understanding the nature of the enemy which usurps Palestine, as it keeps away from the options which are undoubtedly more effective.

Verily, the Zionist entity expressed practically in more than a situation that it neither cares for the so-called international community nor the decisions of the Security Council.

It is not far from us its brutal aggression on Gaza Strip and its brutal aggression against the international solidarity with Gaza in the middle of the sea represented in the convoy of freedom.

This enemy does not understand but the language of power, therefore diplomatic pressure which may succeed to force some countries to stick to the international legitimacy will be less-effective —if not worthless— in the sight of Israel which feels comfortable about leaning to the American Veto which provides coverage to it against the tries of its exposure.

So, the priority —as seen by many observers— is not in demanding for an international acknowledgement, escalating a diplomatic language, and not in the declaration of "a state" which does not depend on any constituents because it has no borders in reality and does not have independent resources, but its president "Abu Mazen" moves from a place to another by the permission of Israel as He himself stated!

The priority is in uniting the Palestinian row, and returning the decision to its original owners —which is the Palestinian people inside and outside— and not to single out few individuals who do not, in the best cases, exceed the number of the hands' fingers.

Moreover, it is importance to rely on the concept of "resistance" as a comprehensive notion that copulates between rifle and word and is not confined to delusive negotiations which pour in the interest of the enemy and gives delay after another in order to usurp the land, implant settlements, demolish neighborhoods and houses, and change the features.

The priority is also for the Arab countries to bear their "Historic responsibility" before demanding others with solidarity and acknowledgement.

The Palestinian cause is now at stake and crossroads: some want to put it to death or freezing while some are working to camouflage it and take it to false tracks.

However, hope is still connected with those people who are confronting the enemy in Palestine to  revive the cause and put it on the right track again in order to stay alive without making any concessions. Even if those people are not able to liberate the land and the sacred sites, the less we can do is to be firm in the time of concessions.